1978 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1978 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 247 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Nissan Bluebird | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Nissan | Reliant |
| Model | Bluebird | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 798 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2290 mm |
