1978 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Bluebird | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1978 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |