1978 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S40 weights approximately 294 kg more than 1978 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1978 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | S40 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1339 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2650 mm |