1978 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1978 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 1978 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Nissan | Land Rover |
Model | Bluebird | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2891 mm |