1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Nissan Cedric (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 580 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Nissan Cedric (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Nissan Cedric | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Cedric | 102 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2160 mm |
