1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2000 Ford Windstar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1978 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Windstar |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3066 mm |