1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 286 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Cedric | Commodore |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |