1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 451 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Cedric | R8 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 525 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2649 mm |