1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Cedric | A6 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2911 mm |