1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1978 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Cedric | Cruze |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2685 mm |