1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Ford Focus
To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Focus (141 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Focus weights approximately 297 kg more than 1978 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Focus (249 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Ford Focus | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Focus |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 249 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1647 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4393 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2045 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1488 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2649 mm |