1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1955 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 60 kg more than 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1955 Plymouth Belvedere | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Plymouth |
| Model | Cutlass | Belvedere |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2930 mm |
