1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1975 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 800 kg more than 1975 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1975 Renault Rodeo has manual transmission. 1975 Renault Rodeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1975 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Cutlass | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2410 mm |
