1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 486 kg more than 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Mazda |
Model | Cutlass | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2875 mm |