1978 Opel Ascona vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1978 Opel Ascona.
Because 1978 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Opel Ascona | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Opel | Rover |
Model | Ascona | 200 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2510 mm |