1978 Opel Ascona vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 705 kg more than 1978 Opel Ascona.
Because 1978 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Opel Ascona | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Ascona | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2649 mm |