1978 Opel Kadett vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 1978 Opel Kadett is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 415 kg more than 1978 Opel Kadett.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Opel Kadett | 1956 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Opel | Riley |
| Model | Kadett | RM A |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1194 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
