1978 Peugeot 305 vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 1,300 cc, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1978 Peugeot 305. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1978 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 481 kg more than 1978 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Peugeot 305. (96 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Peugeot 305. 2010 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1978 Peugeot 305 has manual transmission. 1978 Peugeot 305 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Peugeot 305 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | 305 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |