1978 Plymouth Volare vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Plymouth Volare. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Plymouth Volare would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Plymouth Volare is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1978 Plymouth Volare. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1978 Plymouth Volare. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Plymouth Volare weights approximately 196 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Because 1978 Plymouth Volare is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Plymouth Volare. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Plymouth Volare (231 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1978 Plymouth Volare will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Plymouth Volare | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Plymouth | Seat |
Model | Volare | Arosa |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3685 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2850 mm |