1978 Renault 20 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault 20 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 318 kg more than 1978 Renault 20.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1978 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1978 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Renault 20 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Renault | Cadillac |
Model | 20 | ATS |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1647 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 199 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1503 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1418 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2776 mm |