1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2009 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 624 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2009 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Corvette |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 431 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2206 kg | 1582 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 69 L |
