1978 Seat 127 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 127 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1978 Seat 127. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 127.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 127. (76 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Seat 127 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 127 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1010 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 76 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3270 mm |
