1978 Seat 127 vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 127 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S60 (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1978 Seat 127. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 849 kg more than 1978 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S60 (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 127. (76 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Seat 127 | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Seat | Volvo |
| Model | 127 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1010 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 76 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1569 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2720 mm |
