1978 Seat 133 vs. 1986 Ford Tempo

To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 133 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1978 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 415 kg more than 1978 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications: