1978 Seat 133 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 133 would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1978 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 133.
Because 1978 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Seat 133 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Seat | Volvo |
| Model | 133 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 841 cc | 2519 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
