1978 Skoda L vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1978 Skoda L is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 111 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph Vitesse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Skoda L | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Skoda | Triumph |
| Model | L | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 29 L |
