1978 Skoda L vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,046 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Skoda L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (52 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Skoda L weights approximately 15 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Skoda L (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1978 Skoda L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Skoda L | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Skoda | Subaru |
Model | L | R2 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 30 L |