1978 Skoda L vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 775 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Skoda L | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Skoda | Nissan |
| Model | L | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 16.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
