1978 Skoda L vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 912 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Skoda L | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Skoda | Chevrolet |
| Model | L | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1737 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 71 L |
