1978 Skoda L vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1177 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Skoda L | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Skoda | Jaguar |
Model | L | XF |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 2002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2909 mm |