1978 Suzuki Cervo vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1978 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1978 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1978 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1978 Suzuki Cervo has manual transmission. 1978 Suzuki Cervo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Suzuki Cervo | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Suzuki | Acura |
| Model | Cervo | TL |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 538 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2840 mm |
