1978 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 1968 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,077 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota Corolla (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Toyota Corolla (77 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Suzuki LJ 50 | 1968 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | LJ 50 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1978 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 539 cc | 1077 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2290 mm |