1978 Toyota Celica vs. 1955 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1978 Toyota Celica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1955 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1955 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Celica weights approximately 255 kg more than 1955 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Triumph TR3. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Triumph TR3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Toyota Celica | 1955 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Celica | TR3 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2240 mm |
