1978 Toyota Celica vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 135 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. (174 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Toyota Celica | 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
| Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Celica | Space Star |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1834 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1315 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |
