1978 Toyota Celica vs. 2004 Volvo V50
To start off, 2004 Volvo V50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V50 (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V50 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V50 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Toyota Celica | 2004 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Celica | V50 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2435 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2670 mm |
