1978 Toyota Celica vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,803 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (180 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 139 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (176 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Toyota Celica | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Celica | Celica |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |