1978 Toyota Celica vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 932 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica. 2013 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1978 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1978 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Toyota Celica 2013 Mazda CX-9
Make Toyota Mazda
Model Celica CX-9
Year Released 1978 2013
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1586 cc 3726 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 86 HP 269 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 118 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 70 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 995 kg 1927 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 5108 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1936 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1728 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2875 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 76 L