1978 Toyota Corona vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Corona. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 195 kg more than 1978 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Corona. (135 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Toyota Corona | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Corona | Celica |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 84 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2640 mm |
