1978 Toyota Corona vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,966 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Corona. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 331 kg more than 1978 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Toyota Corona | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Corona | C30 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1966 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |