1978 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,230 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 80 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Because 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser has manual transmission. 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
Model | Land Cruiser | CTS |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4230 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2890 mm |