1978 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 236 kg more than 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser has manual transmission. 1978 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Toyota | Jeep |
Model | Land Cruiser | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4230 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |