1978 Toyota Mark II vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1978 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Toyota Mark II | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
Model | Mark II | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3302 mm |