1978 Toyota Tercel vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, 1992 Volvo 240 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 240 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1978 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1992 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Toyota Tercel | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Tercel | 240 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2660 mm |