1978 Volvo 164 vs. 2002 Volvo V70
To start off, 2002 Volvo V70 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo V70 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 164.
Because 2002 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo V70 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Volvo 164 | 2002 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | 164 | V70 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2800 mm |