1978 Volvo 164 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 164. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 164.
Because 1978 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Volvo 164 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Volvo | Ford |
| Model | 164 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2490 mm |
