1978 Volvo 240 vs. 2012 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover LR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Because 2012 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (508 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover LR4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Volvo 240 | 2012 Land Rover LR4 | |
Make | Volvo | Land Rover |
Model | 240 | LR4 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2127 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 508 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1915 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1882 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2885 mm |