1978 Volvo 264 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1978 Volvo 264 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 264 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 264 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 441 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 264 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 264 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Volvo 264 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | 264 | 220 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1456 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |