1978 Volvo 66 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Volvo 66 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | 66 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |