1978 Zastava 132 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Compass weights approximately 383 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Compass (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: