1978 Zastava 132 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132.
Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Zastava 132 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Zastava | Holden |
| Model | 132 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1756 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2685 mm |
